This is an interesting warning by a fellow named Tom Stipe. As of 2010, Tom is the Senior Pastor of Crossroads Church of
Denver. From 1970 to 1976 he was an assistant pastor at a Calvary Chapel. In the 1980s he played a part in starting (and
leading?) the Vineyard Movement. He was
the one who helped encourage John Wimber to believe
God was speaking to him or such. The
following is a forward Tom wrote for Hank Hanegraaff’s 1997
book Counterfeit Revival.
It had never occurred to me that I could be involved with anything
spiritually destructive. Yet when I reached the lowest spiritual level in my
pastoral ministry that is exactly what had happened. How could I have let
things go so far? From my perspective, serving on the board of directors of the
Association of Vineyard Churches (AVC) had always been a privilege. My wife and
I developed close friendships with the other leaders'. Together we travelled to
numerous countries, planted churches, and shared a vision for ministry. Led by
a respected national leader, we considered ourselves elders of what was rapidly
becoming a new denomination. We maintained a unified sense of mission and
purpose as we pursued what we believed God was leading us to do.
One week, during a leadership conference in the mid- western part
of the United States, several of us were invited to a private meeting. We were
to be introduced to the "prophets" who were slated to have a major
impact on the future of our movement. Since we were already enthusiastic about
the use of spiritual gifts to enhance contemporary church life, our curiosity
spurred us to accept the invitation to this landmark meeting. We entered the
room, settled into our seats, and waited to see what the Lord had in store for
us.
The prophets began to
inform us that in the last days, the Lord was restoring the fivefold ministry
of apostles, prophets, pastors, teachers, and evangelists to the church. We were challenged to accept the
arrival of apostles and prophets because today's church already had plenty of
teaching, pastoring, and evangelizing. The arrival of
the prophets and apostles would lead to the world's last and greatest revival.
The prophets revealed that we had been chosen as the people and the movement
that would lead Christians into this final display of power in the last days.
We were told that one such prophet had been commissioned by God to find the
apostolic leadership and apostolic ministry that, linked with the prophetic,
would provide the basis for this new surge of end time anointing. God had
revealed to the "prophet" that he and our Association of Vineyard
Churches were the chosen ones.
It all sounded downright intoxicating. After struggling with the
daily duties of ministry and our fears of inadequacy, this was exactly what we
wanted to hear. Being told that our struggles and sacrifices had made us
special in God's eyes was a comfort in itself. We clung to the promise that
spectacular things would follow the inauguration of this new move of God. We
listened attentively to the flattery of our new friends, the prophets. Our skepticism
barely peaked above the surface of our consciousness. It disappeared entirely
later in the meeting when one of the prophets singled us out and proceeded to
reveal, in detail, the secrets of our lives. Now they really had our attention.
How could they not be from God? One after another, these accurate "words
from the Lord" seemed to be the perfect validation for everything they
were proposing. We became completely convinced of the validity of this
prophetic anointing. How else could we explain their ability to "see
into" our childhoods and personal histories through their prophetic
gifting?
We returned to our local churches with our minds wide open to this
new phase in the growth of our movement. During the months that followed, many
of us received a plethora of "personal prophecies" predicting our
future roles, positions, and successes in God's new movement. There were words
of prophecy for our ministries, for their locations and growth, prophecies about the great
"restoration" to come and our important part in it.
"Seers" would direct people regularly to their 'land of
anointing." The recipients of such advice would immediately pack up and go
in faith, confident that the predictions of ministry success would come true.
The prophets began telephoning pastors with words straight from God directing
staff changes and adjustments in church policy and practice. They anointed
individuals to healing ministries and apostolic appointments. Then, instead of
waiting for the prophets to call, the pastors began calling the prophets for
predictions, instruction, and advice. Ministry musicians and lay people were
promised star status if they would remain faithful to the prophetic blueprint
unfolded before our movement.
Nevertheless, some of the leaders began to voice concerns and
uneasiness. They had seen people uproot their families and travel great distances
to the "land of their anointing," fail, and then blame God. Associate
pastors and other leaders were wrongly dismissed, indicted, and convicted by
nothing more than a dream or prophecy that accused them of some spiritual
crime. "Fortune cookie" faith soon became more popular than following
God's clear voice in Scripture. Some pastors began raising concerns in board
meetings. Even though we were uneasy, we nervously agreed that spiritual gifts
don't always operate in human beings in a perfect manner. We thought we could
solve the problem by applying one of the movement's most endearing
philosophies: "Don't trim the bush until it's had a chance to grow,"
which means "Let's wait and see what comes of this." We put away our
hedge trimmers, and the prophets continued to operate with impunity. After only
a couple of years, the prophets seemed to be speaking to just about everyone on
just about everything. Hundreds of Vineyard members received the
"gift" of prophecy and began plying their trade among both leaders
and parishioners. People began carrying around little notebooks filled with
predictions that had been delivered to them by prophets and seers. They flocked
to the prophecy conferences that had begun to spring up everywhere. The
notebook crowd would rush forward in hope of being selected to receive more
prophecies to add to their prophetic diaries. Those identified with healing
ministries were holding seminars on formulas and methods for healing prayer,
such as finding "hot spots" on the body. Interpreting the meaning of
physical sensations or "jolts" in the bodies of those who were prayed
over became a necessary part of the healers' "training".
Dreams and their
interpretation soon moved to center stage as prophecy conferences taught devotees to keep a pencil and
notebook on their nightstands to write down each dream as it occurred. These
were later interpreted for God's message. People lived on the edges of their
seats, waiting for the grandiose promises of prophecies to come true. Most
waited in vain. Not long after 'prophecy du jour' became the primary source of
direction, a trail of devastated believers began to line up outside our
pastoral counseling offices. Young people promised teen success and stardom
through prophecy were left picking up the pieces of
their shattered hopes because God had apparently gone back on His promises.
Leaders were deluged by angry church members who had received prophecies about
the great ministries they would have but had been frustrated by local church
leaders who failed to recognize and "facilitate" their "new
anointing.'
After a steady diet of the
prophetic, some people were rapidly becoming biblically illiterate, choosing a 'dial-a-prophet"
style of Christian living rather than studying God's Word. Many were left to continually
live from one prophetic 'fix" to the next, their hope always in danger of
failing because God's voice was so specific in pronouncement, yet so elusive in
fulfillment. Possessing a prophet's phone number was like having a store- house
of treasured guidance. Little clutched notebooks replaced Bibles as the
preferred reading material during church services. Some began to fake the
shaking and eye fluttering symptoms they had been told were signs of the Holy
Spirit coming upon them. They hoped the ministry team would recognize the signs
of God and rush to their sides, lifting their hands and praying, 'More,
Lord!" Shaking, laughing, weeping, and eye twitching always ensured that
the parishioner would attract the immediate attention of the leaders and their
peers. One conference speaker, addressing 8,000 people, discouraged the use of
reference books, commentaries, and language tools for sermon preparation.
Rather, the pastors were exhorted to determine their Sunday messages through
listening for prophecies during long walks with the Lord. Something was
dangerously wrong in the movement. One of my own church board members refused
to make any decision until his hands got "hot," indicating that his
choice was wise. Disturbing symptoms were definitely beginning to show up in my
own fellowship.
In my region of denominational jurisdiction, churches began to
shrink because evangelism had been replaced by mysticism. People began to
complain that church attendance would drop markedly during holiday periods
because parishioners were apparently embarrassed to bring their out-of-town
relatives to visit such a strange environment. Something bad was happening to
the church we had planted fifteen years earlier, and I was beginning to realize
that it was my fault. The 'bush" was clearly growing out
of control. I had reached the lowest point in my ministry, and I was
staring at failure. One of my earliest pastoral mentors had taught, "When you're not sure what God is
saying, go back to what God has already said.' The Bible! What a concept! I
had grown weary of studying past revivals, movements, and histories of the
church, vainly trying to find justification for what was happening in my own
church. It seemed that as a pastor, I had given up what I knew for sure in
exchange for what I could never know for sure. It was time to search the
Word and get back to basics.
After years of pastoral training, teaching, and preaching, I knew
that the bizarre changes in the fabric of our church needed biblical evaluation
and correction if our flock was to survive. I was supposed to be the shepherd,
but I had become a follower. My pasture was in danger of turning into a
dustbowl. Most pastors I know have bouts with insecurity, performance anxiety,
and periods when they are unsure that they have made the right ministry
decisions. While most might think these bouts of emotional insecurity are rare,
they happen every week of the year, between Sundays. One of a pastor's greatest
fears should be that he or she has not been diligent to keep the wolves out of
the sheepfold. The most effective entry point into the church for any
"new" teaching is through the pastor.
I remember well the first time I stepped aside and allowed false
teaching in my church. I was told that we had 'quenched the Holy Spirit long
enough" and that it was 'now time to give the church back to the Holy
Spirit." I was told that the penance for the ecclesiastical felony of
"quenching the Spirit" was to include an "anything goes"
time during every meeting. Order would be set aside, and chaos was to be
invited with prayers like, "Come, Holy Spirit!" This command to Deity
was typically followed by a long period of waiting to see what the Spirit would
do. A mounting sense of anticipation would grow as we waited for the 'manifestations'
to appear. If there was any anxiety, it was dispelled by a liberal application
of Matthew 7:9-11: 'Or what man is there of you, whom
if his son ask bread, will he give him a stone? Or if he ask
a fish, will he give him a serpent? If you, then, being evil, know how to give
good gifts to your children, how much more shall your Father who is in heaven
give good things to them that ask him?'
All of this seemed very comforting at the time, but I always
wondered how far the magic "Satan Shield" extended- 100 yards of
perimeter? Two feet? Was there a time limit, say
midnight, for example, before Satan's minions could again return to their
normal, attacks? How long did the bread and fish "kryptonite' ward off
psychic duplication of God's "voice"? Some of us were suckers for
this kind of manipulation. My feelings of guilt were conjured up by suggestions
that I had exerted too much human leadership and control in the church. All of
my peers were confessing their sin of control and letting go, so I followed
suit. Despite the fact that Scripture nowhere advocates this misinterpretation
of Matthew chapter seven, and in fact commands order in the church (I Cor.
14:17-19), chaos reigned in my church because I had come to believe I needed to
forfeit my duty to maintain order. I had almost lost my commitment to
presenting a clear gospel message to visiting nonbelievers and instead allowed
subjectivity to reign over reasoning from the Scriptures. I needed to repent
and become a true shepherd again. As my wife and I prepared to attend what
would be our last Vineyard board of directors meeting, we rehearsed what we
would say: how we needed to eliminate the swirl of subjectivity that had
entered our church; how we needed to get back to the basics of Christian evangelism
and discipleship; how we needed to restore Bible study to our members' daily
lives. We didn't want to cause trouble. We had formed close
friendships with these people, loved them, and considered them an important
part of our lives. But we could no longer remain silent concerning the
truth.
During the series of meetings, various leadership concerns were
raised about the effect "prophetic" influences were having on the
core of our theology. Some of the leaders who dared to reveal their misgivings
were quickly warned that the "prophet," the "one whose words
never fall to the ground,” had supernaturally heard
our conversations and would report them to the national leader for disciplinary
action. Since “Big Brother" was watching us, we were forbidden to discuss these
issues with other board members. Other directors began to share
"words" that God had spoken to them for the direction of our
movement. One director claimed God had told him that the pure church was the
cell church, and that we should abandon public Bible teaching and evangelism
altogether for small group meetings. Some heralded the position that real
evangelism takes place through "signs and wonders,' when people are
attracted to the Kingdom of God through 'demonstrations" of power. Some
scorned the idea of evangelistic crusades. Some supported the ministry of the
prophets. Others presented evidence regarding the trickery and manipulation
often used by the prophets in their meetings.
Finally, after a week's worth of sometimes heated discussion, prayer,
and meetings, it was all summed up by the dream someone shared the last
night. The dream, related as though it were from God Himself, instructed us to
do nothing, to make no decisions, but to 'wait and see." Frustrated, I
returned to my own church in Denver. I had just witnessed close friends, co-laborers
in Christ, legitimate Christian leaders being 'tossed to and fro by every wind
of doctrine." Our corporate ministry seemed like a laboratory test gone
awry. The adoption of
subjectivity as the primary source of guidance had reduced us to complete
ineptitude as pastors and leaders. What had happened? Why were these Christian
men and women "hearing" so many contradictory messages from God? I
knew without a shadow of doubt that it was time to begin the process of getting
the church God had given me to pastor back to basics. At
that moment, truth became more important than relationships. My wife and I
spoke with our remaining congregation. We knew that if they would commit to
going back to the basics of Christian practice with us, the Word of God
guaranteed that the Lord would work more powerfully and more legitimately in
our lives than ever before. The congregation agreed.
I went back to teaching the
Bible in the most basic fashion I could, verse by verse. When I first announced that we were
going to go through the Gospel 'of John for the better part of the year, the
response of some was, 'Why the Book of John? I read that when I was a baby
Christian.' Others were horrified that I would discourage shaking and twitching
"in the Spirit." What had been a church of 4,400 shrank as people
left to join the 'holy laughter" movement. My hate mail grew to enormous
proportions. Even the movement's leader publicly denounced me, predicting that
God would kill me for my 'sin." God was true to His word in the midst of
the storm that our congregation endured during what we later called 'the year
of slander.' Within a few months, several hundred people came to a saving
knowledge of Christ. Baptisms increased simply because there were new converts
to baptize. People's lives were radically changing, and the church was becoming
healthy again. Attendance increased almost overnight. Within a year, we added a
third service to our Sunday schedule. Currently our congregation is moving past
6,000, and our struggles are with ordinary, normal issues of Christian life. All of this because of the basics. It's really that simple
(see Heb. 4:12-13; 2 Kings 22:8-13; Jer. 15:16).
Books like Counterfeit Revival must be written and
published. You see, in the day of the apostle Paul, the false prophets,
heretics, and legalists resisting his ministry needed to go to considerable
effort to inject the opiate of false doctrine into the church. Long travel by
horseback or on foot, the heat, dust, months away from home, painfully
slow methods of copying documents, all contributed to making the spread of
false doctrine difficult. Not so today-the wonders of the modern world make the
spread of false doctrine deceptively thorough and quick. The urgency of
biblical correction is never more pressing than now. Back in 1517, a huge
contingent of the 'church had fallen to the ruse of a carnal monk named Johann
Tetzel. He conned the believers of his day into purchasing indulgences to
guarantee escape from purgatory. An outraged Martin Luther nailed his
ninety-five theses of dispute on the Wittenberg door, challenging the brokerage
of salvation through the exploitation of people's spiritual insecurities and
illiteracy. Perhaps we have come again to such a dark age with the insurgence
of false revivalism.
If this is the day, then Counterfeit Revival is the
document. This book will be a wonderful tool in the hands of those who love
true spiritual gifts and their brothers and sisters in Christ who have been
confused by the influences of false revivalism. I know. I was there and back,
thank God! Only as the church experiences true reformation will it experience
true revival.